Temp-to-perm vs immediate full-time

Temp-to-perm vs immediate full-time

Temp-to-perm is the right path when the seat is unproven and the company needs a read before a permanent commitment. Immediate full-time is right when the motion, manager, and scorecard already exist.

Best use cases

  • Start temp-to-perm when the first sales hire is the seat that usually fails.
  • Hire full-time immediately when the company has already proved the role and can ramp a permanent person.

What changes by model

OBS. 01

Evidence

Darwinian: The company sees the person and the motion before the offer.

Alternative: The company bets the profile is right before the first quarter is done.

OBS. 02

Speed to pipeline

Darwinian: A bench operator can sell while the permanent req is still open.

Alternative: Pipeline waits on search, notice period, and ramp.

OBS. 03

Commitment

Darwinian: Conversion is a decision, not the default.

Alternative: The cost of a miss is a full-time reset.

Comparison questions

How do the two options differ?

Temp-to-perm is the right path when the seat is unproven and the company needs a read before a permanent commitment. Immediate full-time is right when the motion, manager, and scorecard already exist.

When is Darwinian the fit?

Start temp-to-perm when the first sales hire is the seat that usually fails.

To talk through which model fits, book a call.